In this article we discuss What Should Survive a Rebrand?
Imagine a family-owned bakery preparing to open its fourth shop. Its lettering is awkward, its packaging looks homemade and nobody can find the original logo file. A redesign seems overdue. Yet regular customers describe the business as “the one with the yellow bags”.
The lettering may need replacing. The yellow deserves a conversation.
Rebranding decisions often begin with everything a team wants to escape: an outdated typeface, an embarrassing brochure, a website that no longer reflects the business. Those complaints can be valid. They are also an incomplete brief. Before deciding what the identity should become, establish what people already use to recognise it.
That means treating continuity as a design decision, with evidence behind it. Keeping an element simply because it is old can be as careless as removing it simply because it is old.
Table of Contents
Start With Recognition, Before Preference
An internal presentation is a difficult place to assess familiarity. Employees have seen the identity thousands of times; prospective customers may have encountered it once. Neither group experiences it as a designer arranging immaculate mock-ups on a screen.
Begin by collecting ordinary examples: an invoice, a delivery vehicle, a social post, a product label and the sign above the door. Ask recent customers where they first noticed the business and what they remember seeing. Leave colour, typography and the logo design out of the question initially, so people can answer in their own terms.
Then show individual elements without the company name. Include examples from competitors and an “I don’t know” option, rather than asking a question that makes the answer obvious. Record correct identification, incorrect identification and uncertainty separately.
A small exercise will not produce a dependable market-wide recognition score. It can still expose assumptions worth investigating: the beloved symbol nobody identifies, or the apparently ordinary colour combination people associate with the company. Test unfamiliar prospects separately from established customers; combining their answers hides the difference the rebrand must address.
Give Every Proposed Change a Reason
“It looks dated” is a starting observation. The brief needs the practical consequence. Does the lettering disappear on packaging? Does the symbol imply a service the company has stopped offering? Does the presentation make a specialist business look like a general supplier?
Write a short decision note for each major element. Include what it appears to contribute, where it fails and what evidence would justify changing it. A useful note might read: “Customers identify the red panel; the narrow lettering becomes illegible on small labels; preserve the panel while testing a wider wordmark.”
This makes disagreement more productive. Someone defending the red panel and someone criticising the typeface may be solving different problems, despite appearing to argue about the same logo.
A business appointing a branding and marketing agency should bring this record into the brief before asking for design concepts. It gives the creative team something firmer than competing preferences and helps the client assess proposals against the reasons for commissioning the work.
Change One Variable Before Changing Everything
In the hypothetical bakery, the first concept could keep the yellow, adjust its reproduction for print and replace the lettering. Another could preserve the wordmark’s distinctive proportions while simplifying its construction. A third might explore a complete departure, with the recognition cost clearly acknowledged.
Comparing these routes reveals what each change accomplishes. If every proposal replaces the colour, symbol, typeface and layout simultaneously, it becomes difficult to tell which decision improved the identity and which merely made it unfamiliar.
This does not mean a rebrand must proceed timidly. A business entering a different category or addressing a substantially different audience may need a clear break. The question is whether continuity helps the intended business, rather than whether the old design deserves a tribute.
Sometimes preservation happens through a relationship between elements. A distinctive border, the position of a label or the proportion of colour to white space may matter more than an exact typeface. Designers can retain that relationship while improving the individual parts.
Test The Places Where Recognition Has To Work
A large logo on a neutral background tells you little about a hurried encounter. Put the proposed identity in situations that matter to the business: among competing products, on a phone notification, above a busy shopfront or in a crowded event programme.
For each situation, set a question before showing the work. Can someone find the familiar business? Can they read its name at the intended size? Do they mistake it for a competitor? Keep the task consistent across versions and avoid explaining the design before asking for a response.
Use ordinary production conditions, too. A proposal that relies on a subtle colour difference should be checked on the materials that will actually be ordered. A fine detail needs testing at its smallest required size. These checks help distinguish an attractive concept from an identity the company can use reliably.
Preference is worth recording, but separately. A participant may prefer a new design while failing to recognise the business behind it. That is useful information for the transition plan, even if the new direction remains the right choice.
Make The Transition Part Of The Design
Approval is only the start of what customers will experience. An organisation might change its website immediately while older packaging, vehicles and signs remain in use for months. Without a plan, that overlap can make one business appear to be several.
List the main applications and decide which must change together. Consider a temporary message explaining the new appearance, consistent contact details and a period in which a retained colour or symbol connects the two identities. Avoid adding a second mark everywhere indefinitely; temporary measures need an end date and a reason.
Agree what the team will watch after launch. Questions from customers, mistaken enquiries and difficulty finding the business are more useful than counting complimentary comments alone. None can isolate the effect of design by itself, but together they can reveal practical confusion that needs attention.
Finally, keep a record of the decisions. The next person responsible for the brand should know why the yellow stayed, why the lettering changed and which evidence informed those choices. A rebrand is easier to defend when its continuity is deliberate. It is also easier to improve when nobody has to reconstruct the reasoning from a folder of rejected logos.
Join in The Logo Community
We hope this article has been helpful. If you would like more personal tips, advice, insights, and access to our community threads and other goodies, join us in our community.
You can comment directly on posts, access our community threads, have a discussion and ask questions with our founder Andrew.
Tired of clients questioning your logo design prices? Our new eBook gives you the exact scripts, objection handlers, and confidence to communicate your value. No more awkward pricing conversations—just more high-paying projects.
Get it Now!
